Blackpool's latest lunacy

Fairness Commission Steering Panel announced

AND IT couldn’t be a clearer example of leftie quasi-inclusive diversity cronyism. (Read more)

One has to thank Phil for another excellent exposѐ of events in Dirtpool.  I will diverge from this writer’s line of evaluation to follow one of my own, as I haven’t the foggiest notion of what he has said – I do but I want the thick to really feel at home - which will confuse the Sun readers among my two followers and will irritate to death the establishment and the cabals who infest the political corridors of this dying resort.

My first concern was the selective way this Looney left group proffered figures without any definition of numerators or denominators; no comparisons, no explanations, no calculations and certainly no costing to the tax payer of which this group will loudly proclaim they are of too belong.  From what I read they are mostly paid for by the tax payer and are therefore barred from any panel that might have to scrutinise itself.  It is within the article of the 1998 Human Rights Act- I don’t want to go over old ground – it is within that section that says a Ruling Authority has to be scrupulous impartial.  How can such a body be impartial when the internet – you get little decent journalism from the local press - tells us that the majority of discourse and complaints are about the very bodies this cabal represents?  It’s like writing to the CEO telling him that funds are being misappropriated or that a Councillor has been seen running around with charity boxes under his/her arm!  The reply!  You should go to SpivSavers…

My question over numerators and denominators may tickle anyone over a certain age or who delved into the delights of doing sums.  One of the first things educationalists will thrill you with is Mark Twain’s "Lies, damned lies, and statistics".  That may be so but mathematicians will argue that given accurate facts realistic appraisals – calculations- may be made.  For this to occur we have to distinguish fact from the political polemic of suppressio veri (suppression of the truth) for which this body already allies itself to, by which suggestio falsi (implying a falsehood) will be applied to signify accuracy of statements and rhetoric.  For example, this body may decide to release shop lifting figures to indicate how they have cut crime by 70% on Christmas day without informing you that 95% of shops were closed on that day, a very simple but a common political example of telling the truth whilst also telling a lie.

My angst is more fundamental.  Do we need this body because the Town is Corrupt as a whole, or just corrupt as a part?  If the town is corrupt as a whole then the last person on Earth you would put in charge is one who allows corruption to fester, and here I must defer to the article by Philtheone.  If the Town in corrupt in part then again the last person anyone would want is an elected Councillor who gains monetary advantage whilst this practice proliferates.  By denying the public Freedom of Information, as this council does through nefarious implementation of that Act, that elected Councillor along with the other person could both quite easily be guilt of a criminal act.  The Malfeasance in Public Office Act covers both eventualities, the police as the investigating authority and the council in light of very recent events with Hillsborough and Sir Jimmy Saville ought to be circumspect with the general public.  That which they chose to conceal today may become visible tomorrow.  As with Jimmy Saville’s grave, the retribution caused by such heinous activity could blight devious activists well past “the Last Rights”. 

To this end the only body that the town needs is a decent group of councillors elected on a massive mandate to do what is right for those they are paid to serve and not for what they can make for themselves.  Council elections have to be made compulsory then the half dead cannot complain that their voices are not heard.  Not just that but any, and I mean any interference or fiddling with electoral papers should lead to long and humiliating exposure, not the muted whispers that emanated from dozens of towns throughout the Kingdom.