A must read

The best article today is on
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/if-it-can-happen-down-under.html
Take your time and read thoroughly.
There are comments that this link is unavailable.  read through the blog  http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.co.uk/ 
and you will find this good piece there.

HIV cure by ZimZam witch doctors

 

And some idiots still want an open door policy for Commonwealth elite. This garbage (above) was written by and for the brains of Zimbabwe.  Zimbabwe was and always will be a ruin near to Fort Victoria, was built by Martians and inhabited by the inbreeds from a land called Westminster.

New French boss ticking over

It is very reassuring to see that the future of France is now in the hands of President Hollande.........

Welcome to Google Nigeria

First 100% in mathematical terms

A strictly mathematical viewpoint...it goes like this:

What Makes 100%?

What does it mean to give MORE than 100%?

Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%?
We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%.

How about achieving 103%?

What makes up 100% in life?

Here's a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions:

If:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

is represented as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26.

Then:
H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K
8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98%

and
K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E
11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96%

But,
A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E
1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%

And,
B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T
2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%

AND, look how far ass kissing will take you!

A-S-S-K-I-S-S-I-N-G
1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118%

So, one can conclude with mathematical certainty, that while:
Hardwork and Knowledge will get you close, and Attitude will get you there;
its the Bullshit and Ass Kissing that will put you over the top. Now I know why some people are where they are!

Next iconic?  Now there's something to talk badly...

Same sex Marriage

Is this the same as the Same Sex Dancing Competition?  Words fail the 'Old'!

Welfare to work 'fraud scandal'

The welfare to work firm owned by David Cameron’s former families’ tsar is involved in a “multi-billion-pound scandal” in which public money has been systematically misused, a whistleblower has said.

Today’s headlines in the Daily Telegraph!

When are we going to see that these thieves or alleged thieves are trailed through the Courts as has happened to numerous single mothers earning a couple of quid in her local Chip Shop?

Emma Harrison quit her executive role at the company in February after the launch of a police inquiry into some of its work Photo: Andrew Crowley

If you are friends with a politician you are immune from the levels of probity that governs society in general?  From Town Halls to Westminster the evidence is overwhelming that it is.

In the report it states:- “An auditor with 30 years’ experience, Mr Hutchinson’s statement discloses that despite his discovery of an “ever-increasing volume of frauds”, with two or three new allegations arising on some days, the company failed to act. It cultivated a culture that discouraged employees from revealing improper practices, the document states.

“I encountered unethical behaviour or wrongdoing that fell way below standards that should be expected of organisations funded by significant sums from the public purse,” he wrote.

The repeated incidents of malpractice in the sector have led to a “multi-billion pound scandal”, he claimed in his statement. In his evidence, Mr Hutchinson, who worked at A4e from October 2010 until May last year, alleges:

• A bonus scheme for employers “drove inappropriate behaviour” by staff willing to commit fraud.

• Staff acted in the belief that if their irregularity was discovered, they could resign in the knowledge no further action would be taken.

• Two years on from a 2009 audit report warning fraud was not confined to one part of the country, fraud was still “systemic”.

Another immigrant ring raping Engish girls

Because of the horrifying story that has hit the headlines from in Rochdale, the following story has been concealed from the British public.  I admit to plagiarism but report the whole story anyway because the attitude of these paedophiles should be made public to all who want to keep these New Britons on our ancient soil.  From : http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2012/04/21/247339/#ixzz1vQ9X4I8a

Five men involved in raping and sexually assaulting two Shropshire teenagers have been jailed for more than 38 years.
The two Telford victims, aged 15 and 16, were abducted and lured to a dingy Birmingham flat where ringleaders Amar Hussain and Shamrez Rashid - top picture - repeatedly attacked them, Birmingham Crown Court heard.

Both girls were victims of a series of sex attacks after being plied with alcohol during the 36-hour ordeal in November 2009.

Yesterday, at the end of a four-week trial, Rashid, 20, was given 11 years in a Young Offenders Institution for rape and four concurrent sentences for another rape, abduction of a child, attempted rape and an attempted sexual assault.

Hussain, 21, was jailed for 10 years for three rape offences, involving both victims, and a concurrent sentence for the abduction of a child.

The court was told that after attacking the girls, Rashid and Hussain ‘in effect offered them up to their friends’.

Rashid grinned and laughed in the dock during the hearing and his supporters hurled abuse at the judge as he passed sentence.

Jahbar Rafiq, 28, received eight years for rape and sexual assault and Adil Saleem, 21, was also jailed for eight years for rape.

Amer Choudhrey, 20, was given 15 months at a Young Offenders Institution for the abduction of a child and one offence of sexual assault.

Judge Melbourne Inman QC said the defendants had all abused the girls.

He told Hussain and Rashid they had played a leading role in the abuse.

“You brought the girls all the way from Telford because you knew you could abuse them and they would consent to anything with anyone and you said they were ‘slags’.

“They were extremely vulnerable and you took advantage of them and told others the girls were available,” he said.

The five men, all from the Birmingham area, denied all the charges.

On the direction of the judge, the jury cleared Hussain on one count of sexual assault, and Rafiq and Saleem of abduction.  

Story by By Arthur Mills

Many will say these are British people. I cannot disagree more.  Enoch Powell was so right and history is proving him so.  Others who cannot see the reality and or say that there are thousands of really good immigrants from the same communities as these child rapists, will advocate that we should be wary and lenient.  I say that if British adults were caught behaving as these I would volunteer to go back to work to defend the children of my country and have no ideological claptrap as baggage in preventing me from doing so.

Two cases identical in two small areas of England beggars belief.  What is really happening with the immigrant sex perverts apart from them raping English children?  Nothing.  A life of luxury in hotels run by the state whilst the victims are forgotten and in most cases disbelieved and ignored.

Please note these are English girls and children, NOT WHITE.

Smiling Saturday without kickball

My girlfriend says that a small penis wont affect our relationship.

Whether she's right or not, I'd prefer it if she didn't have one at all!

HAVE NOT HEARD IT PUT BETTER

HAVE NOT HEARD IT PUT BETTER!!!!!!!!

 

 Little Xhosa boy asks his dad, "Dad, what's democracy?"
"Well, son, that's when whites work and we get all the benefits from it!"
"But dad, aren't the white people pissed off about it?"
"Sure they are, but that's called 'racism'"

Bad Law needs repealing, now

Public Order Act 1986

1986 CHAPTER 64

Harassment, alarm or distress.

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,

within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c)that his conduct was reasonable.

(4)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if—

(a)he engages in offensive conduct which [F2a] constable warns him to stop, and

(b)he engages in further offensive conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.

(5)In subsection (4) “offensive conduct” means conduct the constable reasonably suspects to constitute an offence under this section, and the conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) and the further conduct need not be of the same nature.

(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

This is one of the law that crept through Parliament and not a sensible person alive can explain how this benefits or improves the lives of the common man on the Clapham bus?  What possessed the then Conservative Government to enact such a draconian, all powerful and embracing Act with the horrendous consequence to the destruction of Free Speech and political participation can only be called vandalism in its most profound.
Having listened to Peter Thatchell on this morning’s 5 Live breakfast programme, apart from some of his twisted socialist ideals, his courage and conviction on such matters is admirable.  For a confessed homosexual to have the audacity to try and arrest Robert Mugabe whilst the British police stood by and quaked as the murderous tyrants thugs punch Mr Thatchell to the floor was an act of bravado of immense right.  His stance on this awful and anti-British Act is correct and valiant.
Under this Act there is no requirement to prove that the person intended any of the aforementioned likely consequences. Convicted can take place under section 5, regardless of any intention. Surely it wasn’t the intention of Parliament to criminalise innocent words, behaviours or signs unless the paranoia of the political elite was so profound as to be insane.  
The first part of section 5 is about criminalising disorderly behaviour, and words, behaviour or images that are threatening. Threats and disorderly behaviour are unacceptable. Criminalising them is therefore not unreasonable.
As Thatchell argues… “It is less clear that mere abuse warrants criminalisation. What constitutes abuse? Calling someone a "bloody fool" or a "drunken bastard" is abusive but should it be a crime? Different people have different interpretations regarding what level and forms of abuse should be lawful or unlawful. It's a subjective judgement”.
This immoral Act could be a reason why the once strong and active Free Press has become cowered except when owned by the Moguls Murdoch.  It also put in jeopardy anyone trying to get justice from any system that is abusing power it has obtain either legitimately or even perhaps otherwise.  It is also demonstrative of how the police has become selectively indifferent to certain crimes and interpret their roles according to what they don’t have to do rather than what they ought to do.  The Leveson inquiry, the Yates led investigation in MPs abuse of expenses and the hacking offences are all consequence of proportionality and just badly drafted legislation.  Peter Thatchell covers this issue on the blog and it is a must read.  http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/peter-g-tatchell/public-order-act-repeal-section-5_b_1209096.html
One does not have to be a lawyer nor to be legally trained to recognise a series of words to be inappropriate within themselves.  Here is a classic example of a probable good intent going awry because of the poor stewardship of the two Houses of Parliament.  The first priority of an MP is to scrutinised legislation and it appears that it was not done in this instance.  It is time to rectify affairs before more innocent people are criminalised.

REMEMBER THE SHOE BOMBER?

Shoe Bomber Sentence

Remember the "English" guy who got on a plane with a bomb built into his shoe and tried to light it?

Did you know his trial is over?
Did you know he was sentenced?
Did you see/hear any of the judge's comments on TV or Radio?
Didn't think so!

Everyone should hear what the judge had to say.

Ruling by Judge William Young, US District Court.

Prior to sentencing, the Judge asked the defendant if he had anything to say  His response: After admitting his guilt to the court for the record, Reid also admitted his 'allegiance to

Osama bin Laden, to Islam, and to the religion of Allah,' defiantly stating, 'I think I will not apologize for my actions,' and told the court 'I am at war with your country.'

Judge Young then delivered the statement quoted below:

Judge Young:  'Mr. Richard C. Reid, hearken now to the sentence the Court imposes upon you.

On counts 1, 5 and 6 the Court sentences you to life in prison in the custody of the  United States  Attorney General.  On counts 2, 3, 4 and 7, the Court sentences you to 20 years in prison on each count, the sentence on each count to run consecutively.  (That's 80 years.)

On count 8 the Court sentences you to the mandatory 30 years again, to be served consecutively to the 80 years just imposed.  The Court imposes upon you for each of the eight counts a fine of $250,000 that's an aggregate fine of $2 million.  The Court accepts the government's recommendation with respect to restitution and orders restitution in the amount of $298.17 to Andre Bousquet and $5,784 to American Airlines.

The Court imposes upon you an $800 special assessment. The Court imposes upon you five years supervised release simply because the law requires it. But the life sentences are real life sentences so I need go no further.

This is the sentence that is provided for by our statutes.  It is a fair and just sentence.  It is a righteous sentence.

Now, let me explain this to you.  We are not afraid of you or any of your terrorist co-conspirators, Mr. Reid.  We are Americans.  We have been through the fire before.  There is too much war talk here and I say that to everyone with the utmost respect.  Here in this court, we deal with individuals as individuals and care for individuals as individuals.  As human beings, we reach out for justice.

You are not an enemy combatant.  You are a terrorist. You are not a soldier in any war.  You are a terrorist.  To give you that reference, to call you a soldier, gives you far too much stature. Whether the officers of government do it or your attorney does it, or if you think you are a soldier, you are not-----, you are a terrorist.  And we do not negotiate with terrorists.  We do not meet with terrorists.  We do not sign documents with terrorists.  We hunt them down one by one and bring them to justice.

So war talk is way out of line in this court  You are a big fellow. But you are not that big.  You're no warrior.  I've known warriors. You are a terrorist.  A species of criminal that is guilty of multiple attempted murders.  In a very real sense, State Trooper Santiago had it right when you first were taken off that plane and into custody and you wondered where the press and the TV crews were, and he said: 'You're no big deal.'

What your able counsel and what the equally able United States attorneys have grappled with and what I have as honestly as I know how tried to grapple with, is why you did something so horrific.  What was it that led you here to this courtroom today?

I have listened respectfully to what you have to say. And I ask you to search your heart and ask yourself what sort of unfathomable hate led you to do what you are guilty and admit you are guilty of doing?  And, I have an answer for you.  It may not satisfy you, but as I search this entire record, it comes as close to understanding as I know.

It seems to me you hate the one thing that to us is most precious. You hate our freedom.  Our individual freedom.  Our individual freedom to live as we choose, to come and go as we choose, to believe or not believe as we individually choose.  Here, in this society, the very wind carries freedom.  It carries it everywhere from sea to shining sea.  It is because we prize individual freedom so much that you are here in this beautiful courtroom, so that everyone can see, truly see, that justice is administered fairly, individually, and discretely.  It is for freedom's sake that your lawyers are striving so vigorously on your behalf, have filed appeals, will go on in their representation of you before other judges.

We Americans are all about freedom.  Because we all know that the way we treat you, Mr. Reid, is the measure of our own liberties.  Make no mistake though.  It is yet true that we will bear any burden; pay any price, to preserve our freedoms.  Look around this courtroom.  Mark it well.  The world is not going to long remember what you or I say here. The day after tomorrow, it will be forgotten, but this, however, will long endure.

Here in this courtroom and courtrooms all across America, the American people will gather to see that justice, individual justice, justice, not war, individual justice is in fact being done.  The very President of the  United States  through his officers will have to come into courtrooms and lay out evidence on which specific matters can be judged and juries of citizens will gather to sit and judge that evidence democratically, to mold and shape and refine our sense of justice.

See that flag, Mr. Reid?  That's the flag of the United States of America.  That flag will fly there long after this is all forgotten. That flag stands for freedom.  And it always will.  Mr. Custody Officer.  Stand him down.

So, how much of this Judge's comments did we hear on our TV sets?  That was 2001 if memory serves me right.  http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/shoebomb.asp

I have taken this extract from the judge’s speech and checked its authenticity on the Internet.  My reasoning has come over the long campaign I have set against mindless immigration from a culture that neither respects the history of this once great nation, nor the values that have evolved since the turmoil of civil disorder four hundred years ago.  The modern rush to codify every aspect of the Law so that it mirrors the United State is an enormous criminal and intellectual abuse, and has shown through the workings of the Human Rights Act how giving absolute liberty to criminal classes imprisons the law abiding and honest person.  

Teachers either don’t know or refuse to tell students that groups of disaffected British people rebelled against injustice and sought a code of living that suited the New World.  Taking from all intellectual parts of the known world they argued and argued and wrote out a list of promises and expectation that is evolving today.  British law was evolving along parallel lines but with the firm foundation of established law and systems.

The modern politician in his ignorance and haste has destroyed much that is good about our ancient law and as Britons we are now no longer able to say that the Freedoms that our American Cousins pride themselves on and exercise, are shared in this over legislated Hell created by the Blairs and Browns of our time, now expanded by the Cameroons and his school chums.

The recent trial of the immigrants who were raping and trading English children for sex is symptomatic of a country that has lost the integrity of its people and the good common sense of its indigenous masses.  The street that my father was born in is now a foreign enclave with foreign religious places and foreign language.  An MP from a similar background sits as chair of one of the most influential committees in the cesspit called the House of Commons, even though he refused to talk to another committee of the House which was trying to investigate him on charges of malfeasance.  Groups get together for what appears to be the best intention, but because of their timidity and lack of respect for the Rules they have copied the self glorifying and evil sickness of the modern politician, recanting half truths and not recognising lies, worshiping at the altar of collective stupidity.  That is why the mass majority of former servants of Her Majesty do not belong to or attend meetings with cabals and straight forward liars.

A view on Britain's decline

Which made them, regrettably, scandalously, worth more  – to themselves and to the men who used them – than they were to almost everyone else.  For there is another issue here, and one that should be at least as uncomfortable as the Asian dimension for Rochdale and for British society in general.  If these young women were treated as worthless by these Asian men of a certain age and disposition, they were nonetheless seen as worth a little perverted attention. They were not even worth that to those who were supposed to be responsible for them. How could it be that juveniles, below even the age of consent, were so poorly looked after, that they were regularly staying out, frequenting takeaways and mini-cab offices, putting themselves in danger, and no one took the slightest notice?

In the article above by Mary Dejevsky, Asian grooming: The truth is that these girls were worth more to them than to us : the question is made but not answered. I am no sage but will comment from years of observation.

My main concern with the SYSTEM is that it has morphed into an industry that cares only for the “workers” and very little for the subjects the workers are paid by the taxpayer to “care”.  I rest my case at the law courts and the feet of Sharon Shoesmith who responsibility in keeping Baby Peter (Peter Connelly) safe appear secondary to the hurt felt or implied by her obvious incompetent as a senior Public Servant.  It is that same system now ensconced in every council office in England that knows every rule for long and continuous employment, but has little idea on how to keep the vulnerable safe.  What can be more illustrative than in the crimes perpetrated above?

Not that I am blaming anyone except us for allowing this experiment to fester.  I once shared a house with two other divorced males and Sundays could be mayhem with children running amok; not pleasant when you’ve just worked an 18 hour night shift.  One of my friend’s five children was noisy and irritating, as all eight year olds can be when confined to a house.  As I dragged myself round the kitchen making toast and tea for a tribe I didn’t know, I used a trick I had used on my niece a decade earlier, found a book and tried to engage the child in less frantic activity.  To my amazement I discovered the child could not read.  What made me furious was that his father did not know, and worse didn't care as it was the school's responsibility, not his, had never sat with his son and paged through the fantastic choice of free entertainment via the public library?  In a long winded way this is the problem with society and England in particular.  Those parents who cannot discern the line between responsibility and rights are equally let down by systems through “dogmatic adherence to socialist” education and later social indoctrination into how a society should behave.

We have lived this experiment all my life and it is a failure.  The youngsters who pour me my overpriced beer are a cross section of today’s youth.  Some are brilliant but you always get those who have spent a fortnight behind the bar and can tell me how I should receive my small pleasure for which I am forced to pay a pensioners ransom.  Having supped in pubs for over fifty years, it is bad enough that Maggie Thatcher first tried to interfere with my ancient pleasure, but for someone who can’t tell the difference between a top ferment or bottom ferment brew goes beyond the acceptable.

That is society in a pint pot.  Sharon Shoesmith was paid over £100K per anum for a job she was obviously wholly incapable of doing properly, but the Courts decide that her dismissal was worse than the fate of tiny Peter Connelly and awarded her a trillion pound compensation.  That’s the crux of what is wrong with society today.  That argument can be carried on and laid at the feet of politicians who dare to moralise and dictate whilst swimming in cesspits of political nepotism, cultural patronage and out and out malfeasance.  The Courts are telling us that we have to accept terrorist in our midst and politician are destroying our culture and society by flooding the country with Labour Voting aliens.  All the Time Cameron, now two years into office, has done less than nothing.  The Flagship for his navy still and will remain for ever on the dry dock of incompetence and indifference.

At a time when public apathy permits spin and outright lies to be sold as truths, the underlying truths are that the inept English dross has committed harikiri by attitude and lack of involvement other than to breed another generation of the “workshy” who are not fit to stand in silence in memory of OUR Forefathers.  If these parents cannot participate in the growth and education of their won children, how can we expect these same parents to participate in the everyday dialogues on intellectual politics that is above the "how much child benefit do  get" level?

Forget the Queen, last night was Muslim night on the Beeb

Have you noticed that since the Pakistani paedophiles have been convicted that the BBC appears to have been taken over completely by immigrants from the Middle East?

On Newsnight we had the debacle of two prominent British politicians debating the hidden facts of Britain today.  One, Baroness Wasi forgot her batman's outfit, whilst the other, a mouthpiece for Lieber kept forgetting his lines and rambled on like a demented Mullah.  Have we all forgotten how to listen because we are denied the right to object?

All one has to do is to walk down any street in any major town and see the influx of immigration and I am ordered to welcome it.  I might have siblings who want to welcome allcomers with legs wide open but one has to get real.  The whorehouse mentality that now undermines British politics is due to the debasement of language and protest; not the political ideological dogfights of Thatcher and Scargill, but the insidious erosion of rights accelerated into the stratosphere by Blair and Brown.

I am heartily sick of every debate where the media rushes off to Jasmine Alibi Brown for her approval.  I talk to the young about Africa and none have heard of Rhodesia, pseudo political nobodies fly off to Rwanda to make matters better without realising that the dump was a one time Belgium protectorate and had been a former German colony.  Even in Blackpool there are individuals who rant on about Zimbabwe as though it was a reasonable place, with never a mention of the 30 thousand Ndebele that Mugabe had murdered whilst British military advisors turned the other way.  And never a mention that it was the bloody mindedness and sheer hard work that turned an African Wilderness into the bread basket of Africa by a few thousand industrious European farmers.

As a young person I was asked by a member of the elite officer class why I had got so drunk.  I remember the incredulity on his face when I answer, "because I can."  All too often we hear pundits ask that very similar question.  Has the penny never dropped that people do all sorts of things, "BECAUSE THEY CAN!" That officer was a Major Julian Thompson, later a General and Commander of Land Forces during the Falklands War.

Britain is over full.  It is time that we accepted the word of the Late Gordon Brown and started to remove all serious criminals, so let's start with the  thieves of Westminster, then we can get on to the minor immortals in the Councils.  The deafening silence from Blackpool now confronted with the evidence that some of their favourite sons are not the paragons of virtue that they would like us to believe is heartily sickening.  The speed with which they are moving will mean a statute of limitation has been enforced on truth.  Bring back Miss Marples and Hercules Porridge.  They'll ferret out the villains.  Seriously, we don't need fictional characters, we need a CPS, a Police Force with scrupulous credentials and politicians who can think for themselves without needing to ask the already tainted rogues in the Upper Gallery for advise.

Paedophilia is vile.  What is more heinous that it, according to one of these new laws so loved by Lieber, by each and ever definition, it was a Hate Crime.  Every victim was English, every perpetrator was an Immigrant.  Had this sick crime, which, according to all the experts is rampant around the nation, been committed by members of the BNP and or the EDL on immigrant children, the gallows and chopping blocks would already be erected in Luton and Bradford.  And not even a mention of deportation?  You won't hear a word of condemnation chanted from the New Minarets coming to an unauthorised site near you.

Deport the Paedophiles back to their own countries

 They and three other men used a one-time victim to recruit other girls so they could be driven to “chill” houses around the north of England for sordid sex.

Some of the teenagers had sex willingly, but others were raped by up to five men at a time.

The paedophiles who paid small sums of money for the frequently violent encounters were predominantly British Pakistanis.

Of the 11 defendants on trial at Liverpool Crown Court, 10 were Pakistani and the other an Afghan asylum seeker.  The gang, whose activities were centred on two takeaways in Heywood, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, used a 15-year-old white girl as their recruiter. Both restaurants are now under different ownership.
This teenager, nicknamed The Honey Monster, became the girlfriend of one of the gang and kept victims quiet with alcohol, food and small sums of money.
She often accompanied girls as young as 13 on journeys to such towns and cities as Rochdale, Oldham, Nelson, Bradford and Leeds. Sometimes she would be having sex with one man while a second raped another girl in the same room.  (Taken from today's Telegraph)


Why! Oh! Why are newspapers and reporters so loath to use the English language?  From describing that half-wit Nick Griffin as anything other is beyond the use of words.  Whatever made the idiot tweet the results of verdicts before they were presented to the Court?  Just like politicians running to the media to announce something monumental before having the decency to announce matters in Parliament.  As soon as you want to become a Politician, do you have to become a moron?  It appears so.
So politicians are morons, what about journalists?  Can't they just say that an English girl acted for and behalf of immigrants for her own gratifications?  It is about time you stopped calling the English white, that is racist against the English.
My only observation of this case has to be that all those found guilty should be deported along with all their families.  As their DNA is on record, any of their immediate family wanting to enter this once great nation should be imprisoned and deported with instant effect.  Fook that bit about Rights. This action has proven that certain people do not deserve the rights that we have forged for US, not the WORLD.


Let's get the facts straight.  All the children are ENGLISH and not from immigrant decent.  All the perpetrators are immigrants.  Enough said.

An insult too far. Blackpool want to honour a charlatan

Fylde Ex Service Liaison Committee intend to add insult to the real dead Soldiers by building a place of special remembrance to former Councillor Territorial Officer Jim Houldsworth.  The bower, bigger and better than anything donated to "The fallen" will be donated by ???, on the 29th June this year.  So who is paying?  No-one knows.  Perhaps it will come from one of the Secret Accounts as disclosed in previous blogs.  Or perhaps that wonderful mouthpiece for soldiers affairs, Julian Manure has the money in his wife's bank account, just in case?

No-one knows.  The original police investigation at the behest of the Blackpool council leader must have been handed over to Yates of the Back Yard, he who did not investigate any crimes committed by politicians in Westminster, who declared no malfeasance by the Murdoch Emperor, who shot off to the Middle East to subjugate the democratic rights of the people of Bahrain.  It must be noted that the final say on any prosecution is in the hands of the DPP(CPS), the same body whose Preston representative on Criminal Matters left her post to join Rossendales Bailiffs right in the middle of listening to victims angst.

If the squeaky clean members of the Fylde Ex Services Liaison Committee Executive are so proud of their history, why were they plotting to keep accounts and minutes of meetings away from the members of the Service community?  And why have no members of that Committee never asked to view accounts or minutes?  No wonder the majority of former regulars do not belong to the Cabals.  Another handsome donation to the local RMA for another dinner may assuage any dissenting voice from that place.  Pots, piss all come to mind.

Once you become a Committee person, do you forget how to read Rules and ask questions?

Did Councillors commit a conspiracy?

Statutory Conspiracy. Criminal Law Act 1977

Offence: Statutory Conspiracy. Criminal Law Act 1977
Statutory conspiracy is defined by section 1 of the criminal law act 1977

Under section 1(1) if a person agrees with any other person or persons that a course of conduct shall be pursued which, if the agreement is carried out in accordance with their
intentions, either -
(a) will necessarily amount to or involve the commission of any offence or offences by one or more of the parties to the agreement, or
(b) would do so but for the existence of facts which render the commission of the offence or any of the offences impossible,

He is guilty of conspiracy to commit the offence or offences in question.

Accordingly, it is an offence to agree to commit any criminal offence even one which is tryable only summarily. However, by section 4 a conspiracy to commit a summary only offence can only be prosecuted by or with the consent of the director of public prosecutions.

A simple question to both the Investigating Authority (the Police) and the council Officers, is it not conspiracy under the Act above to scheme to make arrangements for the avoidance of money promised, I.E. a debt to the Council?

You will gather from the Rules of the Fylde Ex Service Liaison Committee that the Executive had no powers to make an undertaking with the council for payments of any kind as it had never been cleared and authorised by the Committee of the FESLC; if it had there would be minutes to verify this but readers of this blog have long since learned that Minutes are not some peoples strong points..  The officers in so doing were and had gone outside of their remit and any liability was between the person and the council, good ancient contract law, unless it was a standing arrangement and then the Council ought to have the contract that covers such an event.

So it appears that Cllr Peter Callow was correct in his actions especially as he was informed that £5.000 of supposed Charity money had been deposited in a councillors wife's private bank account "just for the time being".  The fact that the DPP(CPS) and the investigating authority(the Police) came to a conclusion that no prosecution should take place was possibly a fall-out from the massive corruption being exposed in the Daily Telegraph about our principled politicians.  Small wonder that the minnows in local government appear to have gone on their illicit, immoral and fallacious and foolproof schemes of self promotion.  It does not mean that the perpetrators are innocent of deception or fraud or a raft of other serious arrestable offences.

If we can't get them nabbed by the fuzz, perhaps we should swing the tits out of society?

New Street Names and other things

Proposed Names on the New Estates being built - to take the water we don't have, the electricity we don't generate, but houses the shit of which we want to get rid of - to be built by Phantom Builders in conjunction with NotubesCosanostra Scaffolding in support and TwAt plumbers doing the ground work and secret installations on land No-one owns.

Fiddlers Walk - An Estate near you.  One sight is recommended three miles due west of Queens Promenade.

Bent Approach - leading to the Community Centre - paid for by residents but not for them to use, as on Molyneux Drive.
Golden Handshake (or The Nod and a Wank) - the pub that has room for two patrons only at a time, just in case conversations are overheard.  Ideal for organisations with lots to hide like the FESLC, the Political Parties
Cabal Close - for selective residences.
Clanger Way -  pass go and pick up £thousands in passing.  Leads no-where and does nothing.
Hero Street, dedicated to members of a secret society.
Jimwasn'tcorrupt Avenue - a non starter.  They can't find any street who accept being joined to it.
Mandela Bin Laden Square - dedicated to teachers with Laughing Stocks for those who have learned to read, partook in history and whomever dared to complain to the authorities. The Mosque - no planning permission required here - will open it's doors to the East onto the firing ranges and the Female Children Mutilation Clinic.  No wedding area required as they will take place in Yorkiestan, Pakistan and Westminster where influence is growing.
Semen Memorial - a place to practice blue arts, but a Wendy Lewis Stand looks unlikely.
Library - to be found miles away from any homes with no adjoining shops or amenities, for the use of a select few with cars.  All mod eletronic comms which the elderly, the blind and the really thick can't use.

A New School with the motto, First Teach Parents they are NOT their Children's Best Friends -  has already be kiboshed for - Too Young to be Responsible - by Cllr Fealhems group shortly before he was convicted of paedophilia activities. The school will be paid for by PFI and immediately closed leaving the council to pay about £45 million per year into this get richer scheme and out of the defunct/bankrupt education funding system.  No-one will be to blame as the Council Official who oversaw the scheme has bought half of Spain with his pension rights - not from the backhanders that go to councillors.

New directive from Council.
All Crown Greens to be vandalised by the council and turned into Riot Training Areas for the Yoof.  No thanks to the aged, the Veterans or the severely disabled whose one source of free entertainment is to sit in the sun - still not taxed - and enjoy others playing a game made famous in history though Sir Francis Drake.

No trees in the New Estates because the Council "don't know how to care for them" - Ms Sarah Elliot.  Get the Irish in, there's more than tree fellas out of work there.

Secret Accounts? Not in Blackpool, Shirley.

 



































































































For those new to this blog I have attached the former Rules of the Fylde Ex Services Liaison Committee as the present executive have deemed it necessary to change the rules to suit their nefarious activities.  The way this executive behaved has been clearly exposed by the recording of one of their secret meetings for which, like many official meetings, there are no verifiable minutes.

To that I will  highlight statements made by the late Jim Houldsworth (on that recording) . " We have a Secret Account.  We have another account, but that money can be spent 5 times over.  I’ve been waiting for the council to send me a bill – but when they do I’ll be making up the rest of it

Well like when we had the Cenotaph done (?) Fylde Ex Service Liaison was committed to paying to some of it.  We committed at that time erm and we’re now waiting for the Council to bill us for it.

I’m hoping, hoping the council don’t uncover it and it slides through.  

The only problem we’ve then got, all these people knowing that Fylde Ex owes this money, it leaks to the Press that you know that the council not sending its bills (?)...You see what I mean ...If it gets out of this room, its goes to urm  it doesn’t necessarily goes to the press ... They happen to mention it to their local councillor who goes along and sees Weaver and ses..  Why have we not… we’ve got all this money…£30.000(thirty thousand pounds).

Two Councillors, one a JP, discussing illegally held and probably acquired revenues, as a Charity when it is said on more than one occasion in this recording that the Fylde ex Service Liaison Committee has no Charity Status.  It appears that much of this money was donated by Forces Charity for specific purposes.  Had the money not been spent for the reason donated, it ought to have been returned with Thanks to a generous benefactor.  Instead it appears that the Hero Major was intent to spend it to cover himself in more glory, with the Council, but not with real soldiers.  Perhaps a tour of duty in a fighting unit in a real war would have calmed his excesses, with his press friends and political allies.

Why are council officials and councillors so reluctant to investigate?  The police washed their hands of another councillor moving £5,000 into his wife's account?  It is the same laissez faire attitude that permits supposed charity collectors to make a profession of it whilst not supporting genuine and registered charities as run by Melanie Mullin.

As to the above, I draw the readers attention to section 16, Finance. Each Affiliated Association shall pay an Annual Fee to the Committee, the amount to be paid shall be determined each year at the Annual General Meeting.  ALL such monies received shall be applied in carrying out the objectives of the Committee as laid down in Standing Orders.

Don't be bashful, Executives of the FESLC!  Make your own rules up as you go along, or as you feel.  Open a shop maybe, or become a genuine Charity!  Perhaps. 

I hear that Executive Members are scurrying around trying to trace all accounts.  Too little too late.  At least it may keep a couple of names out of the Queen's Jubilee Honours List.

Local Forum Blackpool South

Roseacre School, Blackpool, Wednesday 2nd April 2012.

Another wasted evening and another so-called non-political political meeting chaired by Ms Sarah Elliot of Neighbourhood Services (South).  It bodes badly for the residents of Blackpool South if Ms Elliot, the result of evolution of this breed of bureaucrat, an exercise that has failed miserably, does not learn civility or to recognise that the bad tempered old farts are her paymasters.

Ian Treasure of the NHS, or another Quango, began the session with a run through a questionnaire that was more an inquisition into moral attitudes rather than the effectiveness of the Health Service.  Long since have the health professionals ceased being interested or capable of administering a system on health and fitness having evolved into witch doctors in a profession that peddles pills to sick people.  Ian, bless him, went on and on about the damage done to health by excesses of smoking and alcohol to an audience that is closer to Box Brothers than the Maternity Ward.  Heart disease, diabetes, obesity are all manifestations of excesses of drugs, poor food and lack of exercise.  Pity he did not do a survey of his audience as there was at least one geriatric, former fitness fanatic, non-smoker and a good food freak who is crippled with heart disease, diabetes and an onset of overweightedness (getting fatter) due to lack of exercise because of horrendous arthritic conditions. "C'est la vie".

The performance of Ms Elliot left many in that audience, highly perturbed as she was incapable of answering the most basic of questions.  She heads a department that is tasked to keep the streets clean, but she had no idea of the number of staff, the equipment or the tasks to be undertaken.  She waffled and blustered and demanded absolute silence from an audience who attended to have their voices heard, not subdued as in the Communist States of Liverpool and Ken’s London.

One question highlighted her lack of knowledge or imagination.  Trees in the street!   Councillor Dougie Green related a tale that the head of the department refused to reply to his questions referencing to the trees in his neighbourhood, with a comment, “I was told that to cut the top off trees kills them.”   “Is this true?” asked one incredulous observer.

“Who told you that cropping trees kills them?” (Audience)

“The head of the department,”   Ms Elliot.

“How do you know his information is correct?” (Audience)

“That’s what he’s employed for.”  Ms Elliot.

“Have you verified his statement?”

The debate (short larf) got sidetracked into husbandry of trees to which a growingly exasperated Ms Elliot demanded that she could not answer a single part of that procedure as she knew nothing

“I can’t do that…”  Ms Elliot.

“Who employed this person?”

“Mutter, flutter, mutter mutter.”  Ms Elliot.  “How am I supposed to know a thing like that?”

“Google the question, “ suggested one.  “Have you phoned Newton Rigg and asked the experts?” added another. “You’ve sacked him?” demanded another.

Then Ms Elliot overstepped the mark by misinterpreting political non participation with her concepts of what are political party gerrymandering and genuine local concerns.  Whatever happened to education? At least the pubs were still open when the Farce concluded. 


One question Ms Elliot ignore completely, but is of concern to every parent whose children play football, "Is Fisher's Field legally open to dogs?"

Secret Accounts of the FESLC

In a reply from the Council Leader, Councillor Simon Blackburn, he said that he has the utmost confidence in  the FESLC.  I was going to wait until after inquiries from the Charities and RBL, but this farce has been going on for too long.

In this recording you will hear the late Cllr Jim Houldsworth talk about secret accounts, lottery monies that are not accountable, illegal collections endorsed by the treasurer.  There is but one dissenting voice and his was silenced eventually as he had approached the then leader of the council, Cllr Peter Callow, who acted swiftly and appropriately, but who did not go far enough and whom ought to have stripped this illegal body of the powers that are held by the Council.  You will also hear him say  "if it gets out of this room..."

You would have thought that that statement ought to have been sufficient for at least one person present, a JP no less, to say that the conduct was illegal and therefore jeopardised his standing in the community, but as it was a secret meeting and he thought perhaps that he would be immune to criticism, he stayed with his cabal friends and took full participation in discussing probable illegal activities.

Where are the minutes for this meeting?

Where are the forensic accounts for the FESLC?

Where is the accountability from the "democratic" ex service associations who cannot vote or discuss matters they have no knowledge of?