Site Team
The Consumer Action Group
Distress warrant - assaulted my partner, broke my front door, refused to show warrant- help me defeat them!
I have had two further contacts from Marston's.
Firstly - there is another callout to gravitasuk with a suggestion that he allow Martson's to investigate his complaint directly. I have not received anything so far.
Secondly Marston's have complained about some comments in this thread which they consider be defamatory. I have removed the posts containing those comments as I agree that there is a potential issue.
Please will people try to keep their comments factual and try to avoid comments which might cause us problems. It is more useful to everyone to keep the thread on track so that it remains helpful to the owner of the thread.
Thanks
Firstly - there is another callout to gravitasuk with a suggestion that he allow Martson's to investigate his complaint directly. I have not received anything so far.
Secondly Marston's have complained about some comments in this thread which they consider be defamatory. I have removed the posts containing those comments as I agree that there is a potential issue.
Please will people try to keep their comments factual and try to avoid comments which might cause us problems. It is more useful to everyone to keep the thread on track so that it remains helpful to the owner of the thread.
Thanks
I have not replied to this vein in
the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk
as it will be censured and probably not be published as it directly addresses
the one firm that was responsible for the death of Andy Miller. Before all the hounds start baying through
ignorant indignation, I completely understand and empathise with the
controllers and management of this website as to their unwillingness and
inability to publish views of others for fear of prosecution for libel or
slander. The shame is, as with the
detractors of Levison and those wanting to gag free press and open debate, that
the multi-million pound rogues still push coffins around in the crematorium. Who was it who said “Mighty is the
Dollar! To him all doors do open?” Let us correct that statement. Mighty is the Pound, by him all doors can be
made closed.
There are within that web (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?382413-Distress-warrant-assaulted-my-partner-broke-my-front-door-refused-to-show-warrant-help-me-defeat-them!/page2)
several references to Andy Miller and Marstons Group and queries about the
bailiff, a Mr Cache(!?!?) who, had he not been responsible for Mr Miller’s
death, could be a figment of Marston’s publicity platform.
If the Consumer Action Group
cannot answer some of the questions, let us try to here. For this we will look at the opening
statement by Mr Jack Straw the then Minister of InJustice at that inaptly name
sinecure.
Report of the Investigation into the Enforcement of a Warrant against Robert Miller
1. It
is undoubtedly a tragedy that Robert Miller suffered a heart attack and died on
7 January 2009. Mr Miller’s death occurred whilst a bailiff from the Marston
Group, acting on behalf of HMCS, had driven Mr Miller to a cash-point so that
Mr Miller could pay his outstanding fine.
2. From
the investigation into this matter, which is corroborated by the Coroner’s
findings, it is apparent that there is no connection between the bailiff
activities carried out that day and Mr Miller’s death.
3.
It is clear from the evidence
available that there were actions that could and indeed should, have been taken
differently. These are set out below, in the body of the report.
4.
The entire sequence of events began
with the failure of Mr Miller to pay the fine he was convicted of in court
during the 18 months before he suffered his first heart attack. There were
numerous opportunities for Mr Miller to do so, and he failed at each point to
comply with the order of the Court. This necessitated enforcement action to be
taken. In addition to this, when Mr Miller changed his address, he declined to
inform the court despite his obligation to do so, which further necessitated
the deployment of enforcement action. Whilst it will be of consolation to no
one to know this, it is important to understand that Mr Miller had many
opportunities to settle the outstanding fine but failed to do so and this
obliged the court to enter into the enforcement process.
The report assumes
that a frail, elderly, homeless man, in the initial state of dementia, is
capable of making rational judgment. The
statement made by Mr Jack Straw that Andy had numerous occasions to notify the
court does not sit well with anyone who has worked within the homeless, aged
population as this medical condition is a completely mystery to the majority of
willing volunteers and politicians alike, as it is to many Medical Professionals.
5 On 7 January 2009, it is clear from the
conversations between members of the Miller
family and the bailiff, that
Robert Miller should go to the cash-point, and that the bailiff would drive him
there. This course of action was agreed between them all.
This is bailiff spin
for intimidation, threats and illegal coercion at its worst. Where does it say that the bailiff threatened
to have a schoolboy –at the time at home studying for A level exams – have two
schoolboys arrested for obstruction, a removal van summoned and property to the
value of a speeding fine removed from the premises to cover costs? Where does it mention that the Blackpool Court
had been issued with Mr Miller’s address on the 15th December 2008,
whilst Mr Miller was still in Blackburn Royal Infirmary? Irrelevant is the fact that Mr Miller had
vacated the property at least 18 months earlier? The home was not in his name. Again put aside was that Mr Miller was not
present but conducted a stressful and harrowing three-way conversation over the
telephone with the honorable Mr Cache insulting a deriding a sick and frail
veteran whilst intimidating children?
Nowhere does Jack
Straw concede that a stroke/heart attack victim ought to be protected from
further stress during convalescence, a period medically suggested to be at least
three months, not the thirteen days accounted by Marston’s before they sent
their goon to the wrong address.
Even the DWP denied
the Court access to Mr Miller’s pension, presumably because of lack of money
for Mr Miller to live on. So three tenants
of the Industries own rules were being flouted and all Jack Straw and Marston's
can do is to blame the victim. Forgotten
and ignored are the facts that Mr Miller was serious ill, was over 75 and
had/was homeless. So much for guidelines!
What gets worse is
that Labour had recently plugged a gap in Corporate Law to make industries culpable
for the misdemeanours of their employees with the Corporate Homicide Act 2007. Imagine consternation among victims when
they were invited to the Ministry of Justice to voice concerns, only to find
that the arbiter in that discussion, a senior MoJ official, had negotiated a
contract within the bailiff industry for a lucrative job with Rossendales? From the victims, thank you Ms Christine
Sharples.(sic) We hope you serve your new masters better than
you served the tax payers as your previous employers.
Now Marston’s, Rossendale’s, Ministry of Justice, Police and feeble local politicians, TAKE ME TO COURT.
There is much more
to this infamy and the Coroner, the Police and other agencies, as with in the
Hillsborough debacle, are all culpable of a gross injustice if not Malfeasance.
In a recent series on the Biased Broadcasting Corporation, the bailiff's were portrayed as modern day Robin Hood's taking from companies money that was owed and redistributing it back to the poor and dispossessed that it was owed to.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, the exact opposite is that they are the modern day Sheriff's of Nottingham.
In the case of murdered veteran Andy Miller by one of these Robin Hood's,and the threatening behavior towards members of his family the tactics of a Fascist state were in full evidence; evidence that was clearly ignored by the Ministry of no Justice,the police and Jack Straw.
It must be a very big pot for all of them to piss in!!!