English silenced forever

Back in 2001, Britain’s political parties signed a fantastic pledge. They agreed to say nothing to “stir up racial or religious hatred, or lead to prejudice on grounds of race, nationality or religion.”
This gag order did more than keep the parties polite. Vital issues – from massive immigration and multiculturalism to their eradicating effects on British civilization – were officially banned. Thus, such concerns became impermissible thoughts. Not that such issues weren’t already thoughtcrime, as George Orwell would have put it. But this unprecedented pledge turned “violators” into political lepers.
I thought of that elite code of cowardice this week when a London judge sentenced a 42-year-old British secretary named Jacqueline Woodhouse (above) to 21 weeks in jail. Her crime? An expletive-laden rant about immigration, multiculturalism and the disappearance of British civilization. Not in so many words. But that was the unmistakable gist of Woodhouse’s commentary one January night on the London Underground.
This same week, another London judge ordered two black girls, 18 and 19, to perform community service after a savage physical attack on two white legal secretaries. “I am satisfied what you both did, you did that night because you were fueled by alcohol,” Judge Stephen Kramer said, as though tut-tutting a child’s unknowing apple theft.
A few months ago, another London judge freed four Somali Muslim women who set upon a white couple, yelling, “Kill the white slag,” and other anti-white slurs. The gang beat the woman to the ground and ripped out a patch of her hair. Judge Robert Brown was lenient because, he ruled, as Muslims, the women were not used to being drunk.
Jacqueline Woodhouse was drunk, too, but that was no mitigating factor in her case. She harmed no one, but that was no mitigating factor, either. Judge Michael Snow invoked the “deep sense of shame” Woodhouse’s display elicited, because “our citizens … may, as a consequence, believe that it secretly represents the views of other white people.”
“Thoughtcrime is death,” as Orwell wrote in “1984.”

I found this disturbing account  (read More)  on the Net.  It would not have been so poignant had I not been physically attacked by a service person who had previously attacked a friend because he is - my friend -a BNP supporter, irrespective that he - my friend - is a disabled veteran, this hero (a thug by any name) was defending multiculturalism.  It is illustrative that irrespective of how overstretched the forces are, you must first be indoctrinated into New England and English before being taught how to march.  Ludicrous.
The above article raises so many examples that the English can now no longer boast the freedoms for which many of us fought.  All the new laws are being interpreted in such a way that the gag will soon be on every English person and every woman will be forced into marriage at 8 or shamed into wearing black sacks with a single eye-holes.  The license of this statement is as absurd as the flood of immigration for the benefit of a few Labour politicians has been.