Why MPs are corrupt

For those who accept the lie that Legg is acting retrospectively in his demands that MP's pay back illegal claim, let’s repeat it again slowly, shall we? Expenses are allowable for those costs "INCURRED WHOLEY, NECESSARILY, AND EXCLUSIVELY" in the performance of parliamentary duties. Last checked, that didn’t include pet food, lawn mowers, tree-planting, garden wall building or the acquisition of book-shelves just three months before retirement.
The Green Book did not give MPs line by line instructions over what to do if their lawn needed re-seeding. But common sense might suggest that this was not appropriate use of the accommodation allowance and MPs whining now that it’s unfair for them to have to pay back money spent on lavish re decorations or topiary trimming need to get a grip on reality. The demand that the tax payer should pay £18.000 for a book shelf for a MP in his last months before permanent retirement is offensive under all aspects of sense and even law. The matter of MPs buying and switching houses at the tax payer expense is an offense under law and an offense under decency and for Labour to defend the perpetrators is offensive to the friends and families of those dying for this Once Great Nation.

LET A JURY IN A COURT OF LAW BE THE TRUE ARBITER.