Exposure shows just one culprit

 Where are those responsible for the death of Robert Michael Miller?

Exposure concentrated on Rossendale's because it was current and they had the CEO ready to go on camera.  They did not use material on Andy Miller's case because of the lack of time and the fact that both the Ministry of Justice and a Coroner could see no fault in the actions of Marston Group.

If violating every section of their own codes and completely ignoring their legal obligation under a duty of care, which may make them liable under the 2007 Corporate Homicide Act, is not enough for these learned people, then it is time to invoke Common Law and demand justice for a family badly served by politician, police, the courts and its emanations.

It is but another Hillsborough.  Why would not the Ministry of Justice, when it instigated an inquiry, allow a jury  - as laid down in section 9 of the Act - determine whether there is a case to answer?  Who is being protected?  A simple Labour Minister or a corrupt business culpable of a heinous killing?  Or even both?  The inquiry is so porous in logic and legal evaluation that the spin of factual evidence reads more like a Jeffrey Archer novel than a studied report from a competent authority.

I have been told that the MP's and other's are running scared because the evidence is so obvious twisted that a further miscarriage has been added to the plethora of past injustices; that it is not politically expedient to expose such possible malfeasances at this time.  From a group not able to fill in their expense forms correctly, I'll take my lead from my conscience and if the cowering group in Westminster get insulted, so be it.

Do us all a favour and put me in Court for potential libel, you cowards and liars.