Friday, 27 February 2009
The financial crisis explained in simple terms:
Heidi is the proprietor of a bar in
Word gets around and as a result increasing numbers of customers flood into Heidi's bar. Taking advantage of her customers' freedom from immediate payment constraints, Heidi increases her prices for wine and beer, the most-consumed beverages. Her sales volume increases massively.
A young and dynamic customer service consultant at the local bank recognizes these customer debts as valuable future assets and increases Heidi's borrowing limit. He sees no reason for undue concern since he has the debts of the alcoholics as collateral. At the bank's corporate headquarters, expert bankers transform these customer assets into DRINKEBONDS, ALKOBONDS and PUKEIBONDS. These securities are then traded on markets worldwide. No one really understands what these abbreviations mean and how the securities are guaranteed. Nevertheless, as their prices continuously climb, the securities become top-selling items.
One day, although the prices are still climbing, a risk manager (subsequently of course fired due his negativity) of the bank decides that slowly the time has come to demand payment of the debts incurred by the drinkers at Heidi's bar. However they cannot pay back the debts. Heidi cannot fulfil her loan obligations and claims bankruptcy. DRINKEBOND and ALKOBOND drop in price by 95 %. PUKEIBOND performs better, stabilizing in price after dropping by 80 %.
The suppliers of Heidi's bar, having granted her generous payment due dates and having invested in the securities are faced with a new situation. Her wine supplier claims bankruptcy, her beer supplier is taken over by a competitor. Many Germany Banks and Investment Firms holding worthless or near worthless DRINKEBONDS, ALKOBONDS and PUKEIBONDS and are near broke. The banks are saved by the Government following dramatic round-the-clock consultations by leaders from the governing political parties. The funds required for this purpose are obtained by a tax levied on the non-drinkers and by the Government borrowing from overseas (Not to worry, its future generations of drinkers and non-drinkers who can pay off the loans.)
Finally an explanation.
Even Gordon Broons closest ally can understand this??? Shirley!!!
Thursday, 26 February 2009
Monday, 16 February 2009
Thanks to Hugh
Sunday, 15 February 2009
Saturday, 14 February 2009
Thursday, 12 February 2009
Do not the sentiments of the New Brunswick housewife resonate through this once great nation? No. The lilly livered political elite are showing their true colours. Did not labour take us into a universal war against international terrorism, tied the hands of our soldiers behind their backs, blindfolded the intelligence people and armed them with nothing more than Bibles and shrouds.
Three thousand men women and children were burned to death on 9/11. Was that a great act of mass suicide or mass murder by Muslim fanatics? Answers please on an email to Jaqui Smith if she can get away from fiddling her expense claims or puffing on a weeds.
You who voted this evil wind are now reaping your evil whirlwind. Contrary to what that sycophant Foreign Minister Miliband may say, Geert Wilders does not seem to be contravening British law, but it is the government and all their Jackals which are definitely bringing our institutions into disrepute. Voltaire will be in despair and all the legal theologians laughing at the demise of this now intellectually bankrupt nation, importing 8th Century attitudes and never challenging the veracity of the bigotry. If politician want to allow the unfettered importation of ignorance, subservience and another generation of their supporter, then they must accept that others with wills and minds of their own had a duty and obligation to oppose their mischievous evil.
Until you have seen them all stay stum. Find this pieces on of Wilders' on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0jUuzdfqfc
Fitna is easily viewable on http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3369102968312745410
It is up to each individual to make their own mind up. Enough of this corrupt and cowardly Labour administration
I am still awaiting a retraction from the immigrant MP Shahid Malik for his direct insult at all us former N Ireland veterans and the wonderful people of that part of the United Kingdom. If the drug induced politician who has banned Geert Wilders from these shores, wants to destroy freedom of expression completely, then she can have my medals right up her politically insensitive backside.
When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank: I don't care.
When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and 'fed special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts: I don't care.
And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it, I don't care!!
If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behaviour! If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country! And may I add: 'Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Soldiers don't have that problem.' I have another quote that I would like to add, AND.......I hope you forward all this. One last thought for the day: Only five defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ 2. The Canadian Soldier. 3. The British Soldier. 4. The
This was written by a Canadian woman, but oh how it also applies to the U.S., U.K. and Australia
THIS ONE PACKS A FIRM PUNCH
Here is a woman who should run for Prime Minister!
Written by a housewife in
'Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001 and have continually threatened to do so since?
Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown
Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?
And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency
I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.
I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by beheading in
I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.
I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in
I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs. I'll care when the Canadian media stops pretending that their freedom of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when
In the meantime, when I hear a story about a CANADIAN soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:
I don't care.
When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:
I don't care.
When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and 'fed special' food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:
I don't care.
And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.' Well, Jimmy Crack Corn you guessed it,
I don't care!!
If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behaviour!
If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country!
And may I add:
'Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Soldiers don't have that problem.'
I have another quote that I would like to add, AND.......I hope you forward all this.
One last thought for the day:
Only five defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The Canadian Soldier.
3. The British Soldier.
5. The Australian Soldier
One died for your soul, the other 4 for your freedom.
Tuesday, 10 February 2009
We are also trying to get a clear line out of the foreign office on their apparent determination to suppress the documents that reveal the detail of the torture to which Binyam Mohamed (a British resident in Guantanamo) has allegedly been subjected, and the extent of British knowledge or complicity. Binyam’s military lawyer, Lt Col Yvonne Bradley, will be live on the programme.
1 Binyam Mohamed probably violated the terms of his residency by going to Afghanistan to visit and mix with the Taliban irrespective of his motive. This ought to make his residential credentials null and void. If a private legal firm wants to take this case then all the financial implications should fall on them and their backers and not the tax payer - thousand of whom are being stalked by the same Taliban in the same, said Afghanistan.
2 On the same subject as above. How can anyone justify victims of attempted murder - our soldiers, sailors and aircrews - paying the perpetrators, foreign nationals, for a legal defence when the perpetrators entire actions are an insult to human decency? It is like asking the Jews to finance Nazi defence at Nuremberg.
If this man is getting legal aid from our Exchequer, then legal aid should be extended to every every scroat with a British passport.
Sunday, 8 February 2009
I do not know what the Labour party thinks. Because I have nothing in common with the local MP; I am not homosexual, I have served in war theatre for my country, I have a mind of my own and I detest dogma and I don't centralise my belief around envy: I have nothing in common with the Labour mind. I believe that an MP has to represent all constituents and all situations; just a single glance at MP’s declarations of interests’ shows where their personal preferences lie. Our local MP declares that he works hard for homosexual affairs and matters. That means by implication that he does not work equally hard for injured soldiers, destitute families, heterosexuals, for his ordinary constituents, yet he has been appointed as the Chair for Veteran Soldiers Affairs; this I find incomprehensible and insulting. So Labour does not represent me, does not permit me access to their inner sanctum to challenge their antiquated and narrow views, but they demand that I accept their every epistle as honest, truthful, in my interest and in every one’s interest.
The Conservatives are equally as bad. I spent a short time with the local Conservative Party and I make no apologies that my natural instincts lean towards conservatism with a small ‘c’; not that the semi-literate will understand that distinction. They have a quaint position of political secretary, which in
The Liberal Party are so irrelevant that only the quaint and the flamboyant are members or supporters; but a massively obvious matter of physics hits me squarely between the ears. If the Liberals have their wishy-washy views and manifesto, why cannot an equal group of people have a diversely opposite view and ethos? If ever a Party was opposite or contrary to the Lib Dems than it has to be the BNP.
I am not going to try to explain the BNP as I have not the Lib Dems. The reason, because I have never been to a Lib Dem meeting, have no idea what they are about and find their stance on matters like immigration indefensible and illogical. I have had the displeasure though of attending several BNP meetings. I found the majority of attendees decent and disturbed. The fact was that on every occasion they allowed themselves to be addressed by a short, ginger scouser -do me for racism - who was lucky to get out of the meeting with his head still on his shoulders. Not because of his policies - there were no political views expressed - just a diatribe against the downturn in today's society and where this moron hit a raw nerve was when he started to use the Royal Marines as an example of modern decline. The occasion could not have been more inappropriate as my comrade and BNP supporter,
Why, I ask, does the BNP instil such hatred amongst the power merchants of the mass media and some daily newspapers? This morning on BBC’s The Big Question, they addressed the question posed above. The bias was obvious and even the Devil’s Advocate committed the cardinal sin of showing his bias against the BNP members in the audience. They even imported an eye surgeon who was happy to announce that he did not want his children to be educated by BNP members. No-one challenged this immigrant over his attitude to taking money from BNP members as part of his salary, nor why he had left his home nation where his expertise is sadly missing, to ply his profession where the rewards are far more lucrative and he would have to rub shoulders with people he obviously finds odious. I wonder what he would be saying if he tried to ply his wares in Zimbabwe, Zambia, Bangladesh or even Pakistan –that is a rhetorical question because we all know that we are importing doctors and nurses from the Third World whilst their nations are suffering from a lack of decent medical care.
When Labour and Conservatives can address the questions,… ‘why have you metamorphosed a generation of Sharron Matthews, her lack of literacy or innumeracy in our communities?’ then I will listen. Even addressing the problems has led to a plethora of abuse, yet Sharron Matthews and all the other dross are the results of an experiment of fifty years of social engineering that has failed miserably. We have schools which do not produce sportsmen but hide behind a façade of excellence never earned. In
There are far more important questions than teacher’s or policemen’s political beliefs.
The main question is, why are the English people not allowed to address English problems? And while the types of another Sharon, Sharon Shoesmith, cannot understand that it was on her watch that an evil neglect was perpetrated on the community thus making her accountable, then the situation will never improve. Who do these people think they are, BANKERS?
Friday, 6 February 2009
The clinic which fertilized her ought to loose its license and a good dose of arse kicking should follow. This is madness gone worse. The asylum gates are definitely missing.
Fury as Top Gear host Jeremy
Gordon Brown a 'one-eyed idiot'
The only people this statement will upset are the PC brigade who last evening filled the studio of the Question time audience, the dogs of labour Commons and dour Scots who would take Lucifer over Yahweh as long as he had a tartan.
Thursday, 5 February 2009
Michael Richards Court Speech
Makes one stop and think after reading this:
Michael Richards is better known as Kramer from tv's Seinfeld series.
This was his defence speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act.
He makes some very interesting points. He said : "I'm proud To Be White."
Someone finally said it.
How many are actually paying attention to this ?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You Call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' Honkey,''Whitey,' 'Caveman' ... and that's OK.
But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner , Gook, or Chink .
You call me a racist.
You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you,
so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?
You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day. You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi. You have the NAACP. You have BET.
If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we'd be racists.
If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists. If we had White History Month , we'd be racists.
If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance'
OUR lives we'd be racists.
We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that ?
A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant. If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships you know we'd be racists. There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US . Yet if there were 'White colleges' THAT would be a racist college.
In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists. You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it.
But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.
You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But , when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a
threat to society, you call him a racist.
I am proud.
But you call me a racist.
Why is it that only whites can be racists ?
There is nothing improper about this e-mail.
Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on
This has been doing the rounds for several years now, but deserves airing whenever the BBC and its paid guests forget who buy their insidious license.
Who voted these people into the Council? AND WHY?
Hello and welcome to a brand new edition of 'ASYLUM'.
Today's program features another chance to take part in our exciting competition:
HIJACK AN AIRLINER
A COUNCIL HOUSE!
We've already given away hundreds of millions of pounds and thousands of dream homes, courtesy of our sponsor,
The British Taxpayer.
And don't forget, we're now the fastest growing game on the planet.
Anyone can play, provided they don't already hold a valid British Passport, and you only need one word of English:
Prizes include all-expenses-paid accommodation, cash benefits starting at £180 a week and a chance to earn thousands more begging, mugging and
accosting drivers at traffic lights.
This competition is open to everyone
buying a ticket or stowing away on one of our partner airlines, ferry companies or Eurostar.
No application ever refused - reasonable or unreasonable.
All you have to do is destroy all your papers and remember the magic password:
A few years ago, 140 members of the Taliban family from Afghanistan were flown Goat Class from Kabul to our international gateway at Stansted where local law enforcement officers were on hand to fast-track them to their luxury
£200-a-night rooms in the fabulous four star Hilton Hotel.
They joined tens of thousands of other lucky winners already staying in hotels all over
Our most popular destinations also include the White Cliffs of
If you still don't understand the rules, don't forget, there's no need to phone a friend or ask the audience
Just apply for legal aid.
Hundreds of lawyers, social workers and counsellors are waiting to help.
It won't cost you a penny.
It could change your life forever.
So play today.
Iraqi terrorists, Afghan dissidents, Albanian gangsters, pro-Pinochet activists, anti-Pinochet activists, Kosovan drug-smugglers, Tamil tigers, bogus Bosnians, Rwandan mass murderers, Somali guerrillas...
COME ON DOWN!
Get along to the airport!
Get along to the lorry park!
Get along to the ferry terminal!
Don't stop in
Go straight to Britain
And you are GUARANTEED to be one of tens of thousands of lucky winners in the softest game on earth.
Everyone's a winner, when they play
This is today's mass release email. I would have condemned it to file 13 had it not hit a nerve. Just when I am challenging the authorities and making an application for Judicial Review, without any legal assistance or financial help in a matter concerning a British man, a veteran soldier, an Englishman with a very young family, children under the age of 18, I read that Binyam Mohamed is getting assistance from a large charity, has legal representation from a southern firm of solicitors and Mr David Davis has raised the issue of legality with the British and American governments.
He is not British, has forfeited any assistance by going to the Taliban - on his own admission to rid himself of his drug dependence - an organisation which is murdering BRITISH men and women, has left these shore voluntarily and yet idiots want to drag him back because the Yanks have violated his Human Rights. What about the Human Rights of the families his associates are murdering?
And where is the assistance that British families can readily get when so much charity is being handed out to associates of terrorism, mass murdered, Human Rights abuses and just plain evil.